Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT upheld CMA's categorization of claims related to delay in possession as "put under adjudication". CMA rightly asserted inability to verify rental claims unilaterally when agreement didn't provide for reimbursement of rent or commitment to pay rent. Claims premised on rental agreements fell under adjudication beyond CMA's limited jurisdiction. Unliquidated damages for delayed delivery and mental agony couldn't be admitted without agreement between parties. Appeal dismissed.
NCLAT upheld CMA's categorization of claims related to delay in possession as "put under adjudication". CMA rightly asserted inability to verify rental claims unilaterally when agreement didn't provide for reimbursement of rent or commitment to pay rent. Claims premised on rental agreements fell under adjudication beyond CMA's limited jurisdiction. Unliquidated damages for delayed delivery and mental agony couldn't be admitted without agreement between parties. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.