Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The CESTAT rejected the Chartered Engineer's certificate and value determination for the imported goods, holding that the Engineer failed to justify the quality differences and provide details on suppliers/manufacturers for comparison. The Tribunal directed reassessment of value based on contemporaneous import/NIDB data or sequential Valuation Rules after providing relevant documents to the Appellant. The penalties imposed on the three Appellants u/ss 112, 114A, and 114AA were set aside. The issue of penalty and redemption fine was remanded for fresh consideration.
The CESTAT rejected the Chartered Engineer's certificate and value determination for the imported goods, holding that the Engineer failed to justify the quality differences and provide details on suppliers/manufacturers for comparison. The Tribunal directed reassessment of value based on contemporaneous import/NIDB data or sequential Valuation Rules after providing relevant documents to the Appellant. The penalties imposed on the three Appellants u/ss 112, 114A, and 114AA were set aside. The issue of penalty and redemption fine was remanded for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
