https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84497 The CESTAT rejected the Chartered Engineer's certificate and value determination for the imported goods, holding that the Engineer failed to justify the quality differences and provide details on suppliers/manufacturers for comparison. The Tribunal directed reassessment of value based on contemporaneous import/NIDB data or sequential Valuation Rules after providing relevant documents to the Appellant. The penalties imposed on the three Appellants u/ss 112, 114A, and 114AA were set aside. The issue of penalty and redemption fine was remanded for fresh consideration. en-us Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530 Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84497 The CESTAT rejected the Chartered Engineer's certificate and value determination for the imported goods, holding that the Engineer failed to justify the quality differences and provide details on suppliers/manufacturers for comparison. The Tribunal directed reassessment of value based on contemporaneous import/NIDB data or sequential Valuation Rules after providing relevant documents to the Appellant. The penalties imposed on the three Appellants u/ss 112, 114A, and 114AA were set aside. The issue of penalty and redemption fine was remanded for fresh consideration. Highlights Customs Thu, 02 Jan 2025 08:13:28 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84497