Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The CESTAT rejected the Chartered Engineer's certificate and value determination for the imported goods, holding that the Engineer failed to justify the quality differences and provide details on suppliers/manufacturers for comparison. The Tribunal directed reassessment of value based on contemporaneous import/NIDB data or sequential Valuation Rules after providing relevant documents to the Appellant. The penalties imposed on the three Appellants u/ss 112, 114A, and 114AA were set aside. The issue of penalty and redemption fine was remanded for fresh consideration.
The CESTAT rejected the Chartered Engineer's certificate and value determination for the imported goods, holding that the Engineer failed to justify the quality differences and provide details on suppliers/manufacturers for comparison. The Tribunal directed reassessment of value based on contemporaneous import/NIDB data or sequential Valuation Rules after providing relevant documents to the Appellant. The penalties imposed on the three Appellants u/ss 112, 114A, and 114AA were set aside. The issue of penalty and redemption fine was remanded for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.