Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
No prima facie case of contravention u/ss 3 or 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 was found against the parties. The Commission observed mere price parallelism without plus factors is insufficient to establish cartelization. OP-1's requirements/conditions as a consumer cannot be deemed anti-competitive. Lack of evidence to support allegations of bid-rigging or abuse of dominance led to the closure of the matter u/s 26(2).
No prima facie case of contravention u/ss 3 or 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 was found against the parties. The Commission observed mere price parallelism without plus factors is insufficient to establish cartelization. OP-1's requirements/conditions as a consumer cannot be deemed anti-competitive. Lack of evidence to support allegations of bid-rigging or abuse of dominance led to the closure of the matter u/s 26(2).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
