Alleged cartelization dismissed due to lack of evidence beyond price parallelism. Consumer terms not anti-competitive. https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83308 No prima facie case of contravention u/ss 3 or 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 was found against the parties. The Commission observed mere price parallelism without plus factors is insufficient to establish cartelization. OP-1's requirements/conditions as a consumer cannot be deemed anti-competitive. Lack of evidence to support allegations of bid-rigging or abuse of dominance led to the closure of the matter u/s 26(2). en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:50:46 +0530 Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:50:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator Alleged cartelization dismissed due to lack of evidence beyond price parallelism. Consumer terms not anti-competitive. https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83308 No prima facie case of contravention u/ss 3 or 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 was found against the parties. The Commission observed mere price parallelism without plus factors is insufficient to establish cartelization. OP-1's requirements/conditions as a consumer cannot be deemed anti-competitive. Lack of evidence to support allegations of bid-rigging or abuse of dominance led to the closure of the matter u/s 26(2). Highlights Companies Law Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:50:46 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83308