Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96504 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tribunal held Adjudicating Authority's order cryptic, failing to examine appellants' defense regarding legitimate procurement and supply of gold as business transaction. Authority did not evaluate evidence u/s 108, authenticity of duty-paid invoices, or assayer's disclaimer on foreign origin. Passing common order without appreciating individual facts and evidence amounts to non-application of mind, violating principles of natural justice. Matter remanded to Original Authority for fresh adjudication as impugned order lacked reasoning, not a speaking order. Appeal allowed by way of remand to Adjudicating Authority.
Tribunal held Adjudicating Authority's order cryptic, failing to examine appellants' defense regarding legitimate procurement and supply of gold as business transaction. Authority did not evaluate evidence u/s 108, authenticity of duty-paid invoices, or assayer's disclaimer on foreign origin. Passing common order without appreciating individual facts and evidence amounts to non-application of mind, violating principles of natural justice. Matter remanded to Original Authority for fresh adjudication as impugned order lacked reasoning, not a speaking order. Appeal allowed by way of remand to Adjudicating Authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
