Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Rejection of transaction value declared by appellant was improper as it lacked cogent and comparable evidence from contemporaneous imports. Adjudicating authority failed to consider appellant's evidence on contemporaneous lower-value imports and provide details of higher adopted values. Valuation rules were not followed systematically for re-determining assessable value. Penalty imposed on appellant's partner u/s 114AA lacked requisite ingredients. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Rejection of transaction value declared by appellant was improper as it lacked cogent and comparable evidence from contemporaneous imports. Adjudicating authority failed to consider appellant's evidence on contemporaneous lower-value imports and provide details of higher adopted values. Valuation rules were not followed systematically for re-determining assessable value. Penalty imposed on appellant's partner u/s 114AA lacked requisite ingredients. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
