Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Challenge to order u/s 62 of GST Act, 2017 - petitioner's case of being a small dealer who failed to notice the order. Held that rigors of sub-section 2 to Section 62 need not be pressed as Department's intention is to ensure statutory compliance if dealer complies and pays late fee charges. Delay in filing GSTR 3B on 30.05.2024 beyond 30 days from impugned order dated 30.01.2024 deemed condoned. Petitioner to pay late fee u/s 47. Respondent may independently assess returns and initiate proceedings for any tax shortfall under GST Act, 2017. Petition disposed of.
Challenge to order u/s 62 of GST Act, 2017 - petitioner's case of being a small dealer who failed to notice the order. Held that rigors of sub-section 2 to Section 62 need not be pressed as Department's intention is to ensure statutory compliance if dealer complies and pays late fee charges. Delay in filing GSTR 3B on 30.05.2024 beyond 30 days from impugned order dated 30.01.2024 deemed condoned. Petitioner to pay late fee u/s 47. Respondent may independently assess returns and initiate proceedings for any tax shortfall under GST Act, 2017. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
