Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's belated filing of GSTR-3B return after the order passed under Section 62 of the GST Act could be treated as valid compliance so as to warrant condonation of delay and withdrawal of the order, subject to payment of late fee.
Analysis: The return was filed after the statutory period contemplated under Section 62(2), but the Court treated the object of the provision as securing compliance rather than defeating it once the dealer files the return. The Court also noted that the petitioner had filed the return and that the Department's interest could be protected by levy of late fee and by permitting further assessment, if required.
Conclusion: The delay in filing the return was deemed to be condoned, the impugned order stood treated as withdrawn, and the petitioner was required to pay late fee under Section 47 while leaving the respondent free to proceed further in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a belated GST return is filed, the authority may treat the delay as condoned and the prior order as withdrawn, subject to payment of prescribed late fee and further lawful assessment.