Service permanent establishment requires non-auxiliary services, while arm's-length distributor remuneration precludes further profit attribution in I...
Make-available condition excludes standard SaaS subscription receipts where customers receive no independently usable technical knowledge after subscr...
Anonymous donation classification fails where charitable trusts maintain undisputed donor identity records and evidence corpus contributions' intended...
Challenge to order u/s 62 of GST Act, 2017 - petitioner's case of being a small dealer who failed to notice the order. Held that rigors of sub-section 2 to Section 62 need not be pressed as Department's intention is to ensure statutory compliance if dealer complies and pays late fee charges. Delay in filing GSTR 3B on 30.05.2024 beyond 30 days from impugned order dated 30.01.2024 deemed condoned. Petitioner to pay late fee u/s 47. Respondent may independently assess returns and initiate proceedings for any tax shortfall under GST Act, 2017. Petition disposed of.
Challenge to order u/s 62 of GST Act, 2017 - petitioner's case of being a small dealer who failed to notice the order. Held that rigors of sub-section 2 to Section 62 need not be pressed as Department's intention is to ensure statutory compliance if dealer complies and pays late fee charges. Delay in filing GSTR 3B on 30.05.2024 beyond 30 days from impugned order dated 30.01.2024 deemed condoned. Petitioner to pay late fee u/s 47. Respondent may independently assess returns and initiate proceedings for any tax shortfall under GST Act, 2017. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
