Faceless assessment and registration procedures are updated through electronic communication, revised recovery rules, extended deadlines, and replacem...
Risk-based selective vessel boarding requires accurate declarations and preserves master and agent liability where physical inspections are not select...
Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
The High Court considered the validity of a notice issued u/s 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 regarding GST Audit. The writ petition challenged the Central GST authorities' power to initiate proceedings when the subject matter was already under consideration by State GST authorities. The Court held that the audit notice was valid as it did not pertain to the same subject matter as the State GST proceedings. The petition was disposed of in favor of the authorities.
The High Court considered the validity of a notice issued u/s 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 regarding GST Audit. The writ petition challenged the Central GST authorities' power to initiate proceedings when the subject matter was already under consideration by State GST authorities. The Court held that the audit notice was valid as it did not pertain to the same subject matter as the State GST proceedings. The petition was disposed of in favor of the authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.