The High Court dismissed petitions u/s 91 Cr.P.C, 311 Cr.P.C,...
Court dismisses accused's petitions to recall witnesses and produce bank documents in cheque dishonour case. Accused must be able to rebut presumption.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The High Court dismissed petitions u/s 91 Cr.P.C, 311 Cr.P.C, and 254(2) Cr.P.C by the accused in a cheque dishonor case. The court held that statutory presumptions can be rebutted. The accused's petitions to recall witnesses and produce bank documents were denied by the trial court. The High Court found that recalling witnesses and confronting contradictions is necessary for proper evaluation. The trial court's dismissal of petitions u/s 311 Cr.P.C and 91 Cr.P.C was set aside, but the dismissal of petitions u/s 254(2) Cr.P.C was confirmed. The accused's right to rebut presumptions cannot be hindered by withholding necessary documents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.