Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT directed the AO to conduct a fresh assessment u/s 263 to determine the Fair Market Value (FMV) of shares issued u/s 56(2)(viib). Existing shareholders received substantial shares at a premium, with only a few new subscribers. Citing a precedent, it was found that taxing excessive premium on shares issued to existing shareholders is not applicable as no income accrues to them. The AO's actions were not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Pr.CIT's revisional action lacked jurisdiction under Section 263, leading to the appeal being allowed, canceling the revisional order and restoring the AO's decision.
The ITAT directed the AO to conduct a fresh assessment u/s 263 to determine the Fair Market Value (FMV) of shares issued u/s 56(2)(viib). Existing shareholders received substantial shares at a premium, with only a few new subscribers. Citing a precedent, it was found that taxing excessive premium on shares issued to existing shareholders is not applicable as no income accrues to them. The AO's actions were not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Pr.CIT's revisional action lacked jurisdiction under Section 263, leading to the appeal being allowed, canceling the revisional order and restoring the AO's decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
