Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

ITAT directed fresh assessment u/s 263 for FMV of shares. Existing shareholders not taxable. Pr.CIT's revisional action unjustified.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The ITAT directed the AO to conduct a fresh assessment u/s 263 to determine the Fair Market Value (FMV) of shares issued u/s 56(2)(viib). Existing shareholders received substantial shares at a premium, with only a few new subscribers. Citing a precedent, it was found that taxing excessive premium on shares issued to existing shareholders is not applicable as no income accrues to them. The AO's actions were not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Pr.CIT's revisional action lacked jurisdiction under Section 263, leading to the appeal being allowed, canceling the revisional order and restoring the AO's decision.....