<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT directed fresh assessment u/s 263 for FMV of shares. Existing shareholders not taxable. Pr.CIT&#039;s revisional action unjustified.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78496</link>
    <description>The ITAT directed the AO to conduct a fresh assessment u/s 263 to determine the Fair Market Value (FMV) of shares issued u/s 56(2)(viib). Existing shareholders received substantial shares at a premium, with only a few new subscribers. Citing a precedent, it was found that taxing excessive premium on shares issued to existing shareholders is not applicable as no income accrues to them. The AO&#039;s actions were not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Pr.CIT&#039;s revisional action lacked jurisdiction under Section 263, leading to the appeal being allowed, canceling the revisional order and restoring the AO&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:26:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:26:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT directed fresh assessment u/s 263 for FMV of shares. Existing shareholders not taxable. Pr.CIT&#039;s revisional action unjustified.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78496</link>
      <description>The ITAT directed the AO to conduct a fresh assessment u/s 263 to determine the Fair Market Value (FMV) of shares issued u/s 56(2)(viib). Existing shareholders received substantial shares at a premium, with only a few new subscribers. Citing a precedent, it was found that taxing excessive premium on shares issued to existing shareholders is not applicable as no income accrues to them. The AO&#039;s actions were not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Pr.CIT&#039;s revisional action lacked jurisdiction under Section 263, leading to the appeal being allowed, canceling the revisional order and restoring the AO&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:26:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>