TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues. Firstly, u/s 69A, the AO added sales to the assessee's income due to lack of evidence, despite the assessee providing relevant documents and taking steps against GST fraud. The Tribunal found no need for addition as sales were lower than purchases under the relevant GST number, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Secondly, the AO's addition for bogus purchases was dismissed as statements relied upon were from previous years, and the assessee provided evidence during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal ruled that AO's findings were not based on current year transactions, dismissing the Revenue's second ground.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues. Firstly, u/s 69A, the AO added sales to the assessee's income due to lack of evidence, despite the assessee providing relevant documents and taking steps against GST fraud. The Tribunal found no need for addition as sales were lower than purchases under the relevant GST number, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Secondly, the AO's addition for bogus purchases was dismissed as statements relied upon were from previous years, and the assessee provided evidence during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal ruled that AO's findings were not based on current year transactions, dismissing the Revenue's second ground.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.