Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, finding AO incorrectly treated expenses as direct, supporting Assessee's claim. CIT(A) correctly presumed investments made from interest-free funds. AO erred in not accepting Assessee's computation of disallowance, hence ITAT deleted disallowance u/s 14A. ITAT allowed Assessee's fresh claim for deduction u/s 37(1) for ERV loss, remanding for verification. ITAT upheld deduction of establishment expenses as revenue expenditure. ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal on inclusion of ERV in inventory valuation. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s order on Book Profits u/s 115JB and provision for Leave Encashment u/s 43B(f). ITAT supported Assessee's additional claim for ERV loss deduction, finding AO's rejection erroneous post accepting revised return.
The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, finding AO incorrectly treated expenses as direct, supporting Assessee's claim. CIT(A) correctly presumed investments made from interest-free funds. AO erred in not accepting Assessee's computation of disallowance, hence ITAT deleted disallowance u/s 14A. ITAT allowed Assessee's fresh claim for deduction u/s 37(1) for ERV loss, remanding for verification. ITAT upheld deduction of establishment expenses as revenue expenditure. ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal on inclusion of ERV in inventory valuation. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s order on Book Profits u/s 115JB and provision for Leave Encashment u/s 43B(f). ITAT supported Assessee's additional claim for ERV loss deduction, finding AO's rejection erroneous post accepting revised return.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
