Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, finding AO incorrectly treated expenses as direct, supporting Assessee's claim. CIT(A) correctly presumed investments made from interest-free funds. AO erred in not accepting Assessee's computation of disallowance, hence ITAT deleted disallowance u/s 14A. ITAT allowed Assessee's fresh claim for deduction u/s 37(1) for ERV loss, remanding for verification. ITAT upheld deduction of establishment expenses as revenue expenditure. ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal on inclusion of ERV in inventory valuation. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s order on Book Profits u/s 115JB and provision for Leave Encashment u/s 43B(f). ITAT supported Assessee's additional claim for ERV loss deduction, finding AO's rejection erroneous post accepting revised return.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
