<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Tribunal Upholds Deletion of Disallowance; Supports Fresh Deduction Claim and Validates Revised Return on ERV Loss.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78326</link>
    <description>The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision, finding AO incorrectly treated expenses as direct, supporting Assessee&#039;s claim. CIT(A) correctly presumed investments made from interest-free funds. AO erred in not accepting Assessee&#039;s computation of disallowance, hence ITAT deleted disallowance u/s 14A. ITAT allowed Assessee&#039;s fresh claim for deduction u/s 37(1) for ERV loss, remanding for verification. ITAT upheld deduction of establishment expenses as revenue expenditure. ITAT dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal on inclusion of ERV in inventory valuation. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s order on Book Profits u/s 115JB and provision for Leave.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:43:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:43:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Tribunal Upholds Deletion of Disallowance; Supports Fresh Deduction Claim and Validates Revised Return on ERV Loss.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78326</link>
      <description>The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision, finding AO incorrectly treated expenses as direct, supporting Assessee&#039;s claim. CIT(A) correctly presumed investments made from interest-free funds. AO erred in not accepting Assessee&#039;s computation of disallowance, hence ITAT deleted disallowance u/s 14A. ITAT allowed Assessee&#039;s fresh claim for deduction u/s 37(1) for ERV loss, remanding for verification. ITAT upheld deduction of establishment expenses as revenue expenditure. ITAT dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal on inclusion of ERV in inventory valuation. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s order on Book Profits u/s 115JB and provision for Leave.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:43:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>