Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The case involved the restoration of a dismissed petition for non-prosecution. The Applicant established reasonable grounds for restoration, despite being accused of forum shopping. The Adjudicating Authority's rejection of the restoration application was deemed erroneous as the cause for non-appearance was considered valid. Reference was made to the G.P. Srivastava case on sufficient cause for non-appearance. The Applicant's conduct was questioned, but the Adjudicating Authority's premature observations were deemed uncalled for. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, and the restoration application was granted, emphasizing the Applicant's shown sufficient cause.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
