Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Delhi High Court considered the retrospective cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner. The court found that the Show Cause Notice (SCN) and the impugned order lacked details and reasons for the cancellation, violating principles of natural justice. The court referred to Section 29(2) of the Act, stating that registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively without proper justification. The cancellation must be based on objective criteria, not merely due to non-filing of returns. The court noted that both the petitioner and the respondent sought cancellation for different reasons. The petition was disposed of, emphasizing the need for proper justification before cancelling GST registration retrospectively.
The Delhi High Court considered the retrospective cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner. The court found that the Show Cause Notice (SCN) and the impugned order lacked details and reasons for the cancellation, violating principles of natural justice. The court referred to Section 29(2) of the Act, stating that registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively without proper justification. The cancellation must be based on objective criteria, not merely due to non-filing of returns. The court noted that both the petitioner and the respondent sought cancellation for different reasons. The petition was disposed of, emphasizing the need for proper justification before cancelling GST registration retrospectively.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
