Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The High Court considered a petition seeking revocation of a provisional attachment order u/s 281B of Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs). The ACIT (Hq) on behalf of PCIT (Central), Kanpur Nagar, approved the extension of the attachment. The assessee requested release of FDRs due to business hardship. The High Court order was referenced. The Ld. PCIT (Central) Kanpur revoked all provisional attachments u/s 281B. Immediate steps were directed for releasing the FDRs, with an action report due within a week. Corrective action was noted in response to the petition.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
