Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Levy of tax and penalty on advances received by petitioner - the Explanation to Rule 3[a] to [g] of the KVAT Rules is contrary to Section 4[1][c] of the Act and Article 366[29A][b] of the Constitution of India and is hence unconstitutional - Accordingly levy of tax and penalty on advances received by the petitioner therein, was quashed.
Levy of tax and penalty on advances received by petitioner - the Explanation to Rule 3[a] to [g] of the KVAT Rules is contrary to Section 4[1][c] of the Act and Article 366[29A][b] of the Constitution of India and is hence unconstitutional - Accordingly levy of tax and penalty on advances received by the petitioner therein, was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
