<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Quashes Tax and Penalty on Advances Due to Conflict Between KVAT Rules and Indian Constitution Article 366.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50503</link>
    <description>Levy of tax and penalty on advances received by petitioner - the Explanation to Rule 3[a] to [g] of the KVAT Rules is contrary to Section 4[1][c] of the Act and Article 366[29A][b] of the Constitution of India and is hence unconstitutional - Accordingly levy of tax and penalty on advances received by the petitioner therein, was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 10:11:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 10:11:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Quashes Tax and Penalty on Advances Due to Conflict Between KVAT Rules and Indian Constitution Article 366.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50503</link>
      <description>Levy of tax and penalty on advances received by petitioner - the Explanation to Rule 3[a] to [g] of the KVAT Rules is contrary to Section 4[1][c] of the Act and Article 366[29A][b] of the Constitution of India and is hence unconstitutional - Accordingly levy of tax and penalty on advances received by the petitioner therein, was quashed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 10:11:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>