Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Validity of exercising jurisdiction u/s.263 - Application of the principle of diversion of income by overriding title - transfer of capital asset inherited - The line of difference between ss. 263 and 264 is that while the former can be invoked to remove the prejudice caused to the State the latter can be invoked to remove the prejudice caused to the assessee. - AT
Validity of exercising jurisdiction u/s.263 - Application of the principle of diversion of income by overriding title - transfer of capital asset inherited - The line of difference between ss. 263 and 264 is that while the former can be invoked to remove the prejudice caused to the State the latter can be invoked to remove the prejudice caused to the assessee. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
