<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Jurisdiction Validity u/s 263: Income Diversion, Inherited Assets, and State vs. Taxpayer Prejudice Explained.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27912</link>
    <description>Validity of exercising jurisdiction u/s.263 - Application of the principle of diversion of income by overriding title - transfer of capital asset inherited - The line of difference between ss. 263 and 264 is that while the former can be invoked to remove the prejudice caused to the State the latter can be invoked to remove the prejudice caused to the assessee. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:51:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:51:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Jurisdiction Validity u/s 263: Income Diversion, Inherited Assets, and State vs. Taxpayer Prejudice Explained.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27912</link>
      <description>Validity of exercising jurisdiction u/s.263 - Application of the principle of diversion of income by overriding title - transfer of capital asset inherited - The line of difference between ss. 263 and 264 is that while the former can be invoked to remove the prejudice caused to the State the latter can be invoked to remove the prejudice caused to the assessee. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:51:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>