Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Fixed place permanent establishment under the India-Thailand DTAA requires cogent evidence that the non-resident enterprise carried on its business through a place at its disposal in India. Survey material showing expatriates working with an Indian group company and receiving remuneration from a Japanese parent did not establish that they acted for the Thailand-based supplier, were deputed by it, or that it had a fixed place of business in India. Associated-enterprise status alone was insufficient to create a permanent establishment. On identical facts, the supplier was treated as having no permanent establishment in India, making the transfer-pricing grounds infructuous.
Fixed place permanent establishment under the India-Thailand DTAA requires cogent evidence that the non-resident enterprise carried on its business through a place at its disposal in India. Survey material showing expatriates working with an Indian group company and receiving remuneration from a Japanese parent did not establish that they acted for the Thailand-based supplier, were deputed by it, or that it had a fixed place of business in India. Associated-enterprise status alone was insufficient to create a permanent establishment. On identical facts, the supplier was treated as having no permanent establishment in India, making the transfer-pricing grounds infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
