<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fixed place permanent establishment requires evidence of business carried on through premises at the non-resident&#039;s disposal in India.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102592</link>
    <description>Fixed place permanent establishment under the India-Thailand DTAA requires cogent evidence that the non-resident enterprise carried on its business through a place at its disposal in India. Survey material showing expatriates working with an Indian group company and receiving remuneration from a Japanese parent did not establish that they acted for the Thailand-based supplier, were deputed by it, or that it had a fixed place of business in India. Associated-enterprise status alone was insufficient to create a permanent establishment. On identical facts, the supplier was treated as having no permanent establishment in India, making the transfer-pricing grounds infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:39:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:39:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Fixed place permanent establishment requires evidence of business carried on through premises at the non-resident&#039;s disposal in India.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102592</link>
      <description>Fixed place permanent establishment under the India-Thailand DTAA requires cogent evidence that the non-resident enterprise carried on its business through a place at its disposal in India. Survey material showing expatriates working with an Indian group company and receiving remuneration from a Japanese parent did not establish that they acted for the Thailand-based supplier, were deputed by it, or that it had a fixed place of business in India. Associated-enterprise status alone was insufficient to create a permanent establishment. On identical facts, the supplier was treated as having no permanent establishment in India, making the transfer-pricing grounds infructuous.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:39:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>