International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
A single FIR may cover multiple allegations of cheating arising from one criminal conspiracy where the information concerns the same cognizable offence, occurrence or connected transaction; later complaints may be treated as witness statements during investigation. Whether offences form the same transaction depends on unity of purpose and design, proximity of time and place, and continuity of action, and these considerations are not cumulative. The Magistrate must assess the investigation material to decide whether connected cheating allegations warrant joint charges and trial or require separate trials. Complainants treated as witnesses may file protest petitions against closure reports or proposed discharge.
A single FIR may cover multiple allegations of cheating arising from one criminal conspiracy where the information concerns the same cognizable offence, occurrence or connected transaction; later complaints may be treated as witness statements during investigation. Whether offences form the same transaction depends on unity of purpose and design, proximity of time and place, and continuity of action, and these considerations are not cumulative. The Magistrate must assess the investigation material to decide whether connected cheating allegations warrant joint charges and trial or require separate trials. Complainants treated as witnesses may file protest petitions against closure reports or proposed discharge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.