Section 10A and related deductions: Tribunal rejects separate-undertaking claim, but allows loss set-off, ESOP cost and foreign tax credit in principl...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4201 to 4220 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Permissive possession granted to a developer under a joint development agreement, solely for development and construction while ownership remains with the co-owners, does not constitute possession in part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. Accordingly, section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act is not attracted, and the agreement does not effect a transfer of the capital asset in the relevant previous year. The text notes that where the developer holds possession only as the owners' representative, no capital gains arise merely upon execution of the agreement.
Permissive possession granted to a developer under a joint development agreement, solely for development and construction while ownership remains with the co-owners, does not constitute possession in part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. Accordingly, section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act is not attracted, and the agreement does not effect a transfer of the capital asset in the relevant previous year. The text notes that where the developer holds possession only as the owners' representative, no capital gains arise merely upon execution of the agreement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
