Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Permissive possession granted to a developer under a joint development agreement, solely for development and construction while ownership remains with the co-owners, does not constitute possession in part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. Accordingly, section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act is not attracted, and the agreement does not effect a transfer of the capital asset in the relevant previous year. The text notes that where the developer holds possession only as the owners' representative, no capital gains arise merely upon execution of the agreement.
Permissive possession granted to a developer under a joint development agreement, solely for development and construction while ownership remains with the co-owners, does not constitute possession in part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. Accordingly, section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act is not attracted, and the agreement does not effect a transfer of the capital asset in the relevant previous year. The text notes that where the developer holds possession only as the owners' representative, no capital gains arise merely upon execution of the agreement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
