Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment based on inapplicable information is examined where recorded reasons allege manipulated share transactions involving capital gains or losses, but the taxpayer's actual transaction was an intraday share trade with disclosed business profit. The notes state that, where the alleged transactions do not exist in the taxpayer's case and the disclosed profit remains below the reopening threshold cited in the reasons, the factual foundation for reopening fails. They further note that a Tribunal order quashing such reassessment was not interfered with because no substantial question of law arose from those factual findings.
Reassessment based on inapplicable information is examined where recorded reasons allege manipulated share transactions involving capital gains or losses, but the taxpayer's actual transaction was an intraday share trade with disclosed business profit. The notes state that, where the alleged transactions do not exist in the taxpayer's case and the disclosed profit remains below the reopening threshold cited in the reasons, the factual foundation for reopening fails. They further note that a Tribunal order quashing such reassessment was not interfered with because no substantial question of law arose from those factual findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.