<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment based on inapplicable share-transaction information fails when disclosed intraday profit does not match the recorded reopening reasons.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101843</link>
    <description>Reassessment based on inapplicable information is examined where recorded reasons allege manipulated share transactions involving capital gains or losses, but the taxpayer&#039;s actual transaction was an intraday share trade with disclosed business profit. The notes state that, where the alleged transactions do not exist in the taxpayer&#039;s case and the disclosed profit remains below the reopening threshold cited in the reasons, the factual foundation for reopening fails. They further note that a Tribunal order quashing such reassessment was not interfered with because no substantial question of law arose from those factual findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:27:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:27:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment based on inapplicable share-transaction information fails when disclosed intraday profit does not match the recorded reopening reasons.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101843</link>
      <description>Reassessment based on inapplicable information is examined where recorded reasons allege manipulated share transactions involving capital gains or losses, but the taxpayer&#039;s actual transaction was an intraday share trade with disclosed business profit. The notes state that, where the alleged transactions do not exist in the taxpayer&#039;s case and the disclosed profit remains below the reopening threshold cited in the reasons, the factual foundation for reopening fails. They further note that a Tribunal order quashing such reassessment was not interfered with because no substantial question of law arose from those factual findings.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:27:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>