Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Place of effective management residence rules do not apply to a company whose turnover or gross receipts fall within the stipulated threshold under the Board circular, effective from Assessment Year 2017-18. The notes state that a New Zealand-incorporated company was therefore not liable to Indian tax merely because it had assumed Indian residence and filed returns on that basis, making the tax paid refundable. They further explain that rectification is available where foreign-tax payment was previously disputed but is later settled, and that procedural barriers should not deny substantive double-taxation relief. The rejection of refund was quashed and refund with interest was directed in accordance with law.
Place of effective management residence rules do not apply to a company whose turnover or gross receipts fall within the stipulated threshold under the Board circular, effective from Assessment Year 2017-18. The notes state that a New Zealand-incorporated company was therefore not liable to Indian tax merely because it had assumed Indian residence and filed returns on that basis, making the tax paid refundable. They further explain that rectification is available where foreign-tax payment was previously disputed but is later settled, and that procedural barriers should not deny substantive double-taxation relief. The rejection of refund was quashed and refund with interest was directed in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
