<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Place of effective management threshold exclusion supported refund where assumed Indian residence caused tax payment and double taxation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101801</link>
    <description>Place of effective management residence rules do not apply to a company whose turnover or gross receipts fall within the stipulated threshold under the Board circular, effective from Assessment Year 2017-18. The notes state that a New Zealand-incorporated company was therefore not liable to Indian tax merely because it had assumed Indian residence and filed returns on that basis, making the tax paid refundable. They further explain that rectification is available where foreign-tax payment was previously disputed but is later settled, and that procedural barriers should not deny substantive double-taxation relief. The rejection of refund was quashed and refund with interest was directed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:37:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=912122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Place of effective management threshold exclusion supported refund where assumed Indian residence caused tax payment and double taxation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101801</link>
      <description>Place of effective management residence rules do not apply to a company whose turnover or gross receipts fall within the stipulated threshold under the Board circular, effective from Assessment Year 2017-18. The notes state that a New Zealand-incorporated company was therefore not liable to Indian tax merely because it had assumed Indian residence and filed returns on that basis, making the tax paid refundable. They further explain that rectification is available where foreign-tax payment was previously disputed but is later settled, and that procedural barriers should not deny substantive double-taxation relief. The rejection of refund was quashed and refund with interest was directed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:37:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>