Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Place of effective management residence rules do not apply to a company whose turnover or gross receipts fall within the stipulated threshold under the Board circular, effective from Assessment Year 2017-18. The notes state that a New Zealand-incorporated company was therefore not liable to Indian tax merely because it had assumed Indian residence and filed returns on that basis, making the tax paid refundable. They further explain that rectification is available where foreign-tax payment was previously disputed but is later settled, and that procedural barriers should not deny substantive double-taxation relief. The rejection of refund was quashed and refund with interest was directed in accordance with law.
Place of effective management residence rules do not apply to a company whose turnover or gross receipts fall within the stipulated threshold under the Board circular, effective from Assessment Year 2017-18. The notes state that a New Zealand-incorporated company was therefore not liable to Indian tax merely because it had assumed Indian residence and filed returns on that basis, making the tax paid refundable. They further explain that rectification is available where foreign-tax payment was previously disputed but is later settled, and that procedural barriers should not deny substantive double-taxation relief. The rejection of refund was quashed and refund with interest was directed in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
