Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Transfer pricing adjustment on intra-group services was deleted because the Tribunal followed binding decisions in the assessee's own earlier years, affirmed by the Gujarat High Court, holding that actual receipt of services and business nexus had been demonstrated. It accepted that the TPO could not fix arm's length price at nil merely on perceived lack of benefit, duplication, or shareholder characterisation, and that an ALP determination requires application of a prescribed benchmarking method with comparable uncontrolled analysis. The grounds challenging the validity of assessment were dismissed as not pressed, and the appeal was partly allowed.
Transfer pricing adjustment on intra-group services was deleted because the Tribunal followed binding decisions in the assessee's own earlier years, affirmed by the Gujarat High Court, holding that actual receipt of services and business nexus had been demonstrated. It accepted that the TPO could not fix arm's length price at nil merely on perceived lack of benefit, duplication, or shareholder characterisation, and that an ALP determination requires application of a prescribed benchmarking method with comparable uncontrolled analysis. The grounds challenging the validity of assessment were dismissed as not pressed, and the appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.