Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer pricing adjustment made at nil value in respect of intra-group services availed from associated enterprises was sustainable.
Analysis: The dispute concerned the ALP of GHO non-IT services, GHO IT services and RHO services received from overseas associated enterprises. The assessee had produced documentary material showing rendition of services and relied on the earlier orders in its own case for prior years, which had been affirmed by the High Court. The Tribunal noted that the revenue authorities had not undertaken a proper benchmarking exercise under the prescribed methods and could not determine ALP at nil merely on the premise that the services were duplicative, shareholder in nature, or that the assessee had not derived sufficient benefit. The Tribunal followed the binding earlier decisions in the assessee's own case and the High Court's affirmation thereof.
Conclusion: The transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 17,11,13,551 was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.