<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer pricing on intra-group services cannot be benchmarked at nil without prescribed comparables, the Tribunal holds.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100330</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustment on intra-group services was deleted because the Tribunal followed binding decisions in the assessee&#039;s own earlier years, affirmed by the Gujarat High Court, holding that actual receipt of services and business nexus had been demonstrated. It accepted that the TPO could not fix arm&#039;s length price at nil merely on perceived lack of benefit, duplication, or shareholder characterisation, and that an ALP determination requires application of a prescribed benchmarking method with comparable uncontrolled analysis. The grounds challenging the validity of assessment were dismissed as not pressed, and the appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer pricing on intra-group services cannot be benchmarked at nil without prescribed comparables, the Tribunal holds.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100330</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustment on intra-group services was deleted because the Tribunal followed binding decisions in the assessee&#039;s own earlier years, affirmed by the Gujarat High Court, holding that actual receipt of services and business nexus had been demonstrated. It accepted that the TPO could not fix arm&#039;s length price at nil merely on perceived lack of benefit, duplication, or shareholder characterisation, and that an ALP determination requires application of a prescribed benchmarking method with comparable uncontrolled analysis. The grounds challenging the validity of assessment were dismissed as not pressed, and the appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>