Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing adjustment on intra-group services was deleted because the Tribunal followed binding decisions in the assessee's own earlier years, affirmed by the Gujarat High Court, holding that actual receipt of services and business nexus had been demonstrated. It accepted that the TPO could not fix arm's length price at nil merely on perceived lack of benefit, duplication, or shareholder characterisation, and that an ALP determination requires application of a prescribed benchmarking method with comparable uncontrolled analysis. The grounds challenging the validity of assessment were dismissed as not pressed, and the appeal was partly allowed.
Transfer pricing adjustment on intra-group services was deleted because the Tribunal followed binding decisions in the assessee's own earlier years, affirmed by the Gujarat High Court, holding that actual receipt of services and business nexus had been demonstrated. It accepted that the TPO could not fix arm's length price at nil merely on perceived lack of benefit, duplication, or shareholder characterisation, and that an ALP determination requires application of a prescribed benchmarking method with comparable uncontrolled analysis. The grounds challenging the validity of assessment were dismissed as not pressed, and the appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.