3.
1.Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules (as effective from 1-4-2011), defining the term “input service” excludes specified in sub-clauses (d), (o), (zo) and (zzzzj) of clause (105) of section 65 of the Finance Act, in so far as they relate to a motor vehicle except when used for the provision of taxable services for which the credit on motor vehicle is available as capital goods from the definition of "inpu service".
2.The service charge payable to car service station is covered by ZO of clause (105) of the Finance Act. The said credit is admissible to the company only if the credit on motor vehicle is available as capital goods .
3.The credit on motor vehicles would be allowed as capital goods only to the Service provider of courier,tour operator,rent-a-cab scheme operator, Cargo handling agency, outdoor caterer, pandal and shamiana operator and goods transport agency. (Rule 2(a) (B) of CENVAT credit rules)
4.Motor vehicle will not be considered as "capital goods" for manufactures or other service provider.
5.Therefore, admissibility of CENVAT credit in this case depends upon business of the company.
6.If the company is in any business mentioned in para3, CENVAT is admissible.
7. If company is in any other business, you can take CENVAT credit only if you can prove that such service was directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture of final products or providing taxable ouptut service. but even in that case particulary when there is specific exclusion clause, it is highly debatable . The litigation is highly expected if the company takes CENVAT credit. Thus, it will be business call to take or forgo credit based on amount involved.