Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

MISPLACED ARE-1 AND SHIPPING BILL

RAM SHARMA

DEAR EXPERTS,

MY ORIGINAL ARE-1 AND SHIPPING BILL HAS BEEN MISPLACED. NOW I HAVE SUBMITTED ENDORSED  COPY OF ARE-1 ,SHIPPING BILL, FIR  OF ARE-1 AND BRC FOR EXCISE DUTY CLAIM UNDER RULE 18. NOW EXCISE DEPARTMENT OBJECTION THESE ISSUE. PL SUGGEST AND TELL ANY DECESION IN THIS REGARD.

THANKS

Individual Seeks Reconstructed Shipping Bill to Resolve Excise Duty Claim Under Rule 18; Submission of BRC Suggested An individual reported the misplacement of their original ARE-1 and Shipping Bill documents, which are necessary for claiming excise duty under Rule 18. They submitted endorsed copies along with a FIR and BRC, but faced objections from the Excise Department. A respondent advised requesting the Commissioner of Customs to reconstruct the Shipping Bill and submit it to the Central Excise Officers, emphasizing that the submission of the BRC should confirm the export of goods, addressing the department's objections. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues