Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Business Expenditure U/s 36

HIMANSHU JARIWALA

Mr. X has received remuneration from partnership firm. Which he treated as his business income u/s 28(v). Against this income he claimed interest exps. which he paid on unsecured loan from from various parties. The A.O. wants to disallow this interest exps arguing that remuneration received is salary income and interest exps can not be allowed. Can Mr. X Claim Intrest paid on unsecured loan as exps against remunuration received from partnership firm which is treated as business income U/s 28(v). Pls. advise... Pls indicate case law if any?

Dispute Over Classification of Mr. X's Remuneration as Business Income vs. Salary Under Section 28(v) of Income Tax Act Mr. X received remuneration from a partnership firm, which he classified as business income under Section 28(v) of the Income Tax Act. He claimed interest expenses on an unsecured loan against this income. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) intends to disallow the interest expenses, arguing that the remuneration is salary income, not business income. CA Rachit Agarwal clarified that while interest payments are not needed to earn salary, both salary and interest fall under 'Income from Business/Profession.' Therefore, they can be offset to compute income under this category. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
CA Rachit Agarwal on Dec 29, 2010

Section 28(v) has following parts-

1. Interest- Earned from the Capital Contribution made to Partnership Firm

2. Salary- Earned from his efforts and managing business.

It is definite that to earn salary, no interest payments required. Hence interest payments not be allowed as deductions.

However as soon as salary and interest both comes under the perview of "Income from Business/Profession", hence both could be netted off (i.e Salary from firm and interest payments to firm) to compute the income from said head.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues