Section 54F - ownership proof unavailable

[satbir singhwahi]

whether investment u/s 54F for contsruction of residential house on land inherited , where no proof of land ownership is available , but residential house is contructed and proved by inspection by inspector of Income tax and electricity bill. whether in the absence of clear ownership of land is not on record, 54F deduction can be denied?

[Rama Krishana]

To claim the benefit of exemption u/s section 54, ownership of the property must be there in the name of assessee who claims the exemption. The investment in construction of a residential house on land inherited, may qualify for exemption u/s 54 if there is proof of inheritance and ownership consequently. Ownership and clear ownership are two terms which are not recognized in the Income Tax Act, Once you say that you are the owner of the land, you are entitled to claim the exemption. There are various case for this purpose, you may also find the following case useful: 2009 -TMI - 33351 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

[DEV KUMAR KOTHARI]

The construction of residential house is necessary for claiming benefit of S. 54F. The land may be owned fully or partly or one may have some other interest in land or proportionate share in it. In case of old family properties, inheritted, there may be ownership by way of adverse possession as well. So ownerhsip is to be established with relevant facts and circustances with documents available like municipal records, recorsds of Gram Panchayat, history of parents and grand parents holding land etc. We find many sale deeds in which it is simply stated that the vendor ( or his parents/ grand parents) owned the land.. without any reference to their purchase deed. Such cases are ownership by adverse possession.

AI Summary

Eligibility for Tax Exemption Under Section 54F: Inherited Land Ownership Must Be Proven for Residential Construction. A discussion focuses on the eligibility for tax exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act when constructing a residential house on inherited land without clear ownership proof. One participant asserts that ownership must be in the claimant's name, suggesting that proof of inheritance and ownership is necessary. Another contributor notes that ownership can be established through various means, including adverse possession, and emphasizes the importance of supporting documents like municipal records. They highlight that ownership claims often rely on historical possession without formal purchase deeds.