We have received favorable order from commissioner (A) for one issue and for another issue no 2 the order is negative.
Assess want to file GSTAT appeal for issue no 2 so for issue no.1 can assess file refund of proportionate pre deposit?
Loading...
150 credits ยท 30 days
Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.
Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?
Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?
We have received favorable order from commissioner (A) for one issue and for another issue no 2 the order is negative.
Assess want to file GSTAT appeal for issue no 2 so for issue no.1 can assess file refund of proportionate pre deposit?
Where Commissioner (Appeals) allows Issue No. 1 but confirms Issue No. 2, and the assessee proposes to appeal only Issue No. 2 before GSTAT, the assessee can claim refund of the proportionate pre-deposit attributable to Issue No. 1, provided that relief has attained finality and the Department has not challenged it.
The pre-deposit relating to Issue No. 2 should remain attributable to the surviving dispute and be considered for the GSTAT appeal requirements.
The recent Bombay High Court decision in IBM India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (28.08.2026) supports refund of pre-deposit corresponding to the demand/issue dropped by the first appellate authority, even where the assessee pursues further appeal on the surviving issue.
The refund claim should be supported by the appellate order, pre-deposit proof and a clear issue-wise computation.