Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 121124
Like 0 Bookmark

Order passed under Sec.73 without penalty and later rectificed u/s.161

Date 16 Sep 2026
Replies 1 Reply
Views 31 Views
Rectification of assessment orders raises whether penalties can be imposed after discrepancies were dropped following payment of short-paid tax.
Rectification under section 161 is questioned where an order under section 73 had dropped all discrepancies after the taxpayer remitted identified short-payment before the personal hearing. A later order under section 161 imposed separate CGST, SGST and IGST penalties. The central contention is that the later penalty imposition is an afterthought rather than correction of a mistake apparent on the record. (AI Summary)

Brief facts are:

Client was issued ASMT-10 on 02-Mar-26 and reply was filed on 15-Apr-26 . Not satisfied Tamil Nadu GST department issued DRC-01 producing the ASMT-10 discrepancies verbatim on 05-May-26 again and the same reply was uploaded on 23-May-26.

Just before date of personal hearing on 16-Aug-26 we noticed certain short-payment and remitted the same and GST department passed orders dropping all discrepancies.

On 14-Sep-26 department issued Sec.161 Order imposing penalty u/s.73 of CGST Rs.10,000/-, SGST-10,000/- and IGST-20,000/-.

This is clearly an after thought and not on account of a mistake apparent on record. My query do we have a arguable case here? I request experts to give me their opinion and suggestions on the strategy to be adopted by the client. Profuse thanks

1 answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide

No Replies are present.

Recent Issues