GST Position in the Absence of Clinical Establishment Registration
Entry 74 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) exempts health care services provided by a clinical establishment, an authorised medical practitioner or para-medics. The notification defines a clinical establishment as a hospital, nursing home, clinic or any institution providing diagnosis, treatment or care for illness or injury. Notably, the notification does not expressly require registration under the Clinical Establishments Act or any State law as a condition for availing the exemption.
Accordingly, if the company operates a consultation centre, employs qualified doctors, provides medical consultation through such doctors, and raises invoices in its own name, there is a sustainable view that the services continue to qualify as exempt health care services, even without clinical establishment registration. Medical consultation itself constitutes health care and the exemption is not limited to diagnostic, surgical or inpatient services.
However, the absence of clinical registration increases the risk of litigation. The GST authorities may contend that the company is merely providing administrative or infrastructure support and is not operating a clinical establishment. This risk is higher where the company only facilitates consultations by independent doctors rather than itself providing medical services.
The exemption is considerably stronger where the doctors are employees of the company, the company contracts directly with patients, collects the consultation fee and assumes responsibility for the medical services rendered.
It should also be examined whether registration under the applicable State Clinical Establishments law is mandatory for an OPD consultation centre. While non-registration may not automatically deny the GST exemption, failure to obtain a registration required under State law may invite regulatory consequences and could weaken the company's position during a GST audit.
Accordingly, the company should maintain adequate documentation, including doctors' employment agreements, medical registrations, patient records and invoices evidencing that it is itself providing health care services. On the facts provided, the exemption appears supportable, though the absence of clinical establishment registration presents a moderate litigation risk and should be evaluated in light of the applicable State law.