Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsAppJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 120843
Like 0Bookmark

ASMT 10 issued against for same grounds same FY

Date 01 Apr 2026
Replies4 Replies
Views 714 Views
ASMT-10 scrutiny can repeat on the same year, but replies should address the substantive issue and seek ASMT-12 closure.
Scrutiny under ASMT-10 may involve repeated queries for the same financial year where an earlier notice on ITC reconciliation has already been replied to in ASMT-11. The discussion notes that a second notice may still be issued if the earlier discrepancy was not fully addressed or if the later notice concerns a distinct point. The suggested course is to reply on the substantive issue, place the earlier submission on record, and seek closure through ASMT-12 once the department is satisfied. (AI Summary)

Respected Experts,

I want to know whether, ASMT-10 can be issued twice for identical grounds for same FY.

Previously, ASMT-10 was issued for FY 2022-23 under the parameter "Excess ITC availed in GSTR-3B/GSTR-9 which is not confirmed in GSTR-2B/GSTR-2A (Common)" this was due to unreconciled ITC shown in GSTR-9C, to which we had duly replied in ASMT-11. After that, no further communication was received.

Now, after one year, another ASMT-10 has been issued for the same year under the parameter "Unreconciled tax in Table 9S and unreconciled ITC in Table 12F of GSTR-9C." However, there is no such unreconciled tax in GSTR-9C, and the unreconciled ITC is already covered in the previous ASMT-10. Hence, this appears to be a repetition of the query raised by the department.

Is the 2nd ASMT-10 valid?

4 answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide

No Replies are present.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues