Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Independent Witness and videography in search Under section 67 of the GST Act

HimangshuKumar Ray

67(10) of GST Act with relevant provision of BNSS, 2023, and CBIC instruction no No. 01/2020-21(GST-Investigation) dated 02.02.2021  says about two independent witness and videography during search, seizure. My question is that can the employee be the witness ? Patna HC in Shri Sai Food and Rajasthan HC in Kirishna Oil ... case held that employee can not be the independent witness. Is there any case laws of GST and previous regime in this context. and also judgements on Videography context.

 

Section 67(10) GST requires independent witnesses and videography for searches; absence weakens evidence and invites scrutiny Section 67(10) of the GST Act, related rules and a CBIC instruction require two independent witnesses and videography during searches and seizures to ensure fair, credible proceedings. Certain high courts have held that an employee cannot serve as an independent witness, and the apex court has emphasized videography's evidentiary value. An independent witness is described as neutral, respectable, not habitual, and preferably a local resident. While absence of such witnesses or videography weakens evidentiary value and may render proceedings vulnerable, courts do not automatically void actions but apply heightened scrutiny to departmental evidence. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues